The pressure to change the name of the N.F.L. team in Washington from its current nickname to something, anything, less derogatory toward humans of a particular skin tint is ramping up. Roger Goodell, N.F.L. Commissioner, has said time and again that it is a team issue and the league can't actually force an independently-owned franchise to change its name.
Oh . . . I'm betting it could. If I, for a big instance, bought the Atlanta Falcons and renamed them the Cotton Pickers, what do you want to bet the league would step in and say, "Um . . . No." They (the league) just don't want to because Daniel Snyder might turn around and sue the league for infringement of something or other. So they are playing it safe by saying, "It's not our place," and basically relying on outside pressure.
But since the only outside pressure most of those people understand is the pressure that comes from the loss of money, things won't change until advertisers refuse to pay money to the franchise. They need to tell TV stations they won't buy advertising when the Washington team is playing. Sports stores need to quit carrying Washington merchandise. Steve Ballmer just paid $2 BILLION for the Clippers. Why not ask him to buy up every ticket for any Washington games that are slated to be nationally televised and then shred them, leaving the TV crews to show pictures of an almost empty stadium? ESPN could make a unilateral decision and inform all their announcers that the team was to be called The Team in Washington, and that their logo would no longer be shown on air.
But this brings up another dilemma: What to rename the team? What would you call a team based in our nation's capital (or just outside it, actually)? What would you call a team based in the political hotbed of the world, a place filled with congress men and women, a place filled with senators, secret service, joint chiefs of staff, lobbyists and mucky-mucks of every kind?
The Senators is already owned by MLB, and so is the Nationals. Hmm ... I suppose, based on the overall production (or lack thereof) of the team and how they can't get things done, you could call the team the Washington Congress. But that doesn't really have a good ring to it. What to call the team .....
I KNOW!!! They could be called the Washington Snakes and their emblem could be the head of a snake with its forked-tongue prominently displayed.
Wednesday, June 11, 2014
That team in Washington, D.C.
Posted by
Reverend Ref +
at
6:46 PM
Labels: football
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A Few Words About Comments
Comments are always welcome here, but there are a few things you should know:
1) If you comment, leave a name. If you can't figure out how to log in or register or whatever the system is making you do (which, believe me, I fully understand how frustrating that can be) and you must comment anonymously . . . leave a name in the comment section. Purely anonymous comments will be deleted.
2) Comments I deem to be offensive, irrelevant, or generally trollish will be deleted. I'm mainly talking to the Akurians here. Don't make me get out my flag!
3) If you would like to receive e-mail notification of other comments so you can more easily follow a conversation (yeah, like I ever have those on this blog), you must register with Blogger. Sorry . . . I didn't have anything to do with that one.
Enjoy the game.
1) If you comment, leave a name. If you can't figure out how to log in or register or whatever the system is making you do (which, believe me, I fully understand how frustrating that can be) and you must comment anonymously . . . leave a name in the comment section. Purely anonymous comments will be deleted.
2) Comments I deem to be offensive, irrelevant, or generally trollish will be deleted. I'm mainly talking to the Akurians here. Don't make me get out my flag!
3) If you would like to receive e-mail notification of other comments so you can more easily follow a conversation (yeah, like I ever have those on this blog), you must register with Blogger. Sorry . . . I didn't have anything to do with that one.
Enjoy the game.
The War in Ukraine
Friends' Parishes
Clergy Blogs
Friendly Blogs
Mental Recess
- Awesome Food Recipes
- Awkward Family Photos
- Babylon Bee
- Bloggess
- Brick Testament
- Cake Wrecks
- Catholic Satire
- Chocoloate
- G.U. "Zags" Men's Basketball
- G.U. "Zags" Women's Basketball
- Motivational Reality
- NASA
- Optical Illusions
- Politics, Religion, Sports, and Stuff
- Red Green
- Right Behind
- Secular Religion
- Veggie Tales!
- WHL Hockey
Personal Stuff
small god in an itty-bitty box that i made in wood shop
Previous Posts
The Church
Church News Sites
Church Resources
- Anglican Liturgy in New Zealand
- Backstory Preaching
- BCPs of the Anglican Communion
- Bible Gateway
- Canadian Confirmation
- Christian Classics Etheral Library
- Crosswalk Bible Concordance
- Daily Office Prayer
- Daily Offices
- Forward Movement
- Grow Christians
- Lectionary for the Church Year
- Lectionary Musings
- Olive Tree Bible Search
- Orthodox History
- Pop Theology
- The Anglican Theological Review
- The Hymnal 1982
- The Thoughtful Christian
- Time Management
- Working Preacher
4 comments:
But the Indians themselves are fine with the name.
It strikes me that long ago there was a baseball team called the Washington Capitols, but I DO like your name much, much better. Perfect!
YF: Some are, some aren't. It really isn't any different than saying, "Some African-Americans are okay with n*****." And while the history of the word is convoluted, there is a negative connotation with it and the marginalization of a particular group of people. It needs to go.
Lady Anne: The Capitals would be a good name, but the NHL is using it.
My husband is half Cherokee, and while I can only speak for the folks I've met, they generally don't find the name Indian offensive. What they DO fins offensive is the term "Native American". Every blinkin' one of us born here, so we are ALL "natives". Grandfather felt it was just "one more attempt by the Great White Father to get the red man to disappear". The Canadian term "First Nations" is probably the best descriptive. (Or we could just call them Americans and let it go at that.)
Post a Comment